Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Vegan gym bunny, 71, becomes Instagram star – building a following of “hot muscled men”

Vegan gym bunny, 71, becomes Instagram star – building a following of “hot muscled men”

Vegan gym bunny, 71, becomes Instagram star – building a following of “hot muscled men”

2019-10-31 11:41 Last Updated At:11:41

Jane Thurnell-Read is hoping to prove that you are never too old to get fit.

BODY

A septuagenarian vegan gym bunny – frequently thought to be at least a decade younger – has become an unlikely Instagram star who delights fans with pictures and videos of her workouts and proudly boasts a following of young “hot, muscled men.”

Growing up, Jane Thurnell-Read, 71, absolutely hated sport, but all that changed when she met her partner John Payne, also 71 – a keen triathlete – during her mid-40s and he introduced her to the world of fitness.

Now hitting the gym three times a week and lifting up to 55kg (8st) during gruelling work outs, Jane, of Exminster, Devon, joined Instagram, on a friend’s advice and has built up hundreds of followers – including a hot, male contingent – who flood her page with supportive comments.

She said: “I thought Instagram was for young, beautiful women, but I promised a friend I’d join.

“As I pressed post on my first ever picture, I was absolutely cringing – almost waiting for the negativity to come.

“But instead, the love and support has been so heartwarming. I even have all these younger men following me – all muscled gym types – who’ll comment, ‘Go Jane, go,’ on my pictures.”

Strangely, Jane, who has two children, Jon, 39, who manages a bike hire business, and senior lecturer Tom 37, as well as a 13-year-old grandson, positively despised PE classes at school.

“I was very unfit. I couldn’t even touch my toes,” she recalled. “I hated sport – I wasn’t interested at all.”

Then, in her twenties, she dipped her toe in the water, by taking up swimming.

She added: “It wasn’t proper swimming, though. It was that head up, not wanting to get your hair wet, type thing.”

She also started going to the gym, but said it was more of a hobby, meaning she did not work especially hard during her sessions.

Then, when her children came along, fitness again took a back seat. “I didn’t do anything at all for a good 15 years after I became a mum,” she said.

Everything changed when Jane met her partner of 25 years, John, in 1994.

Explaining how their paths first crossed, she laughed: “I was working at the time as a kinesiology practitioner, which is essentially a complementary therapy based on muscle monitoring.

“John brought his then-girlfriend in for an appointment. The connection between us was instantaneous, but it took a while for us to actually get together. Obviously, it was tricky from the professional side of things, and with his relationship too.”

But when they eventually became a couple, she began to learn more about his hobbies and discovered he was an accomplished triathlete.

She continued: “I didn’t even know what a triathlon was back then. When John told me, my first words were, ‘Why would anybody want to do that?’

“Eventually, he persuaded me to go on a tandem bike ride with him. I couldn’t actually ride a bike at the time, so I sat completely still, absolutely terrified.”

She added: “The next day my neck and jaw ached from where I’d been so tense. But, I loved him, so I decided to learn how to cycle.

“In the beginning, I felt quite embarrassed. It’s one thing to be six and be wobbly on your bike, not knowing what to do – but it’s another to be 46.

“I felt like people were staring a lot, wondering why I couldn’t cycle. Plus, as an adult, you have that fear you don’t have as a child.”

Thankfully, Jane soon got the hang of cycling and, to her surprise, fell in love with it.

She especially liked long rides exploring the countryside, and even has a couple of cross-country expeditions under her belt.

In 2004, she cycled 4,200 miles from Seattle to near Boston in the USA, as part of an organised tour, and in 2012, made her way from Saint Petersburg, Russia, to Istanbul, Turkey, covering more than 3,000 miles over seven weeks.

But she did not reintroduce the gym to her life until she was in her sixties, and a friend she knew through cycling encouraged her to come along.

At that point, she had not set foot in a gym since her twenties – 40 years earlier– but she found her first session so enjoyable that she was soon back.

“I loved seeing myself getting fitter and stronger,” she said.

Around five years ago, Jane took things to the next level and found herself a personal trainer – Will Scudder at Unit 7 Gym – who she still works with today.

Now, she will hit the gym three times a week for one hour workouts, focusing on her strength and balance. She also cycles up to 40 miles a week, using her bike as transport.

Keen to prove to other older people that it is never too late to get fit, she said: “I wish I could bottle how I feel and give it to other people. They would absolutely love the gym if they knew.”

She continued: “I completely understand that some of the bigger chain gyms may feel intimidating, but it’s all about finding the one that’s right for you.

“Gyms are absolutely not just for the young – they are for everyone. I’ve had nothing but support, and people seem to love seeing me there at my age.

“It’s important to be friendly, too. It’s easy to get caught up in ourselves, but if you take the time to chat to someone else and see how they are, it can create a really lovely environment.”

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

people always smile when they see me wearing this sweatshirt.⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ #veganfortheanimals

A post shared by Jane Thurnell-Read (@thrivingjane) on

As well as photos and videos of her workouts, Jane also shares vegan recipes on Instagram, after adopting the diet four years ago, following decades of vegetarianism.

She continued: “I mainly went vegan for ethical reasons, as I believe it is possible to be healthy without hurting animals, and treating them like machines.

“But I believe it’s had huge health benefits too. My skin is clear, I have lots of energy and I recover from my workouts much faster.”

Currently, Jane can lift 55kg (8st) worth of weights, and she also incorporates squats, sit ups and TRX resistance bands into her workouts.

“I’m aiming to be able to lift a lot more,” she said. “My day-to-day health has really improved since I returned to the gym.

“Little tasks like moving furniture, lifting heavy shopping out the car or running up and down the stairs are done without even thinking about it, whereas before I may have struggled.”

With no plans to hang up her gym kit any time soon, Jane hopes that sharing her story will encourage others her age to get fit.

She concluded: “People are afraid of getting old, and a lot of the time in the media, we are represented as decrepit, with no interests or enjoyment left in life – almost as if we are waiting to die.

“I hope it helps inspire people to see someone of 71 out there getting fit and lifting weights.”

She concluded: “People often put me in my late 50s or early 60s. I’ll even get people my age saying to me, ‘It’s alright for you, you can go to the gym at your age – I’m in my seventies.’ When I tell them I am too, that usually wipes away their whole argument.

“There’s no excuse and no reason not to get fit. It’s good for you physically and mentally, and I feel amazing.”

Follow Jane on Instagram @thrivingjane

Next Article

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg takes the stand in historic antitrust trial

2025-04-15 06:04 Last Updated At:06:10

WASHINGTON (AP) — Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg took to the witness stand on the first day of a historic antitrust trial to defend his company against allegations it illegally monopolized the social media market.

The trial could force the tech giant to break off Instagram and WhatsApp, startups Meta bought more than a decade ago that have since grown into social media powerhouses.

FTC attorney Daniel Matheson called Zuckerberg as the first witness, as it seeks to prove that Meta acquired Instagram and WhatsApp to preserve its monopoly in the social networking space.

At the trial, Matheson focused on a communication sent to colleagues that illustrated Zuckerberg’s frustration with a lack of progress on developing a photo-sharing app to compete with Instagram’s.

“The way I read this message is that I’m not happy about how we’re executing on that project,” Zuckerberg said.

Matheson followed up by asking if that was because of Instagram’s rapid growth.

“That does seem to be what I’m highlighting,” Zuckerberg said, adding that he’s always urging his teams to do better.

Later in the day, Zuckerberg appeared frustrated when Matheson asked him about his concerns expressed about how fast Instagram was growing.

“I don’t have the full timeline of Instagram’s development in my head,” Zuckerberg said, when Matheson asked him about his mention of its growth. “You could probably get that better from somebody else.”

Matheson also asked about comments of plans to keep Instagram running, while focusing on Facebook and not investing in Instagram. Zuckerberg said he wouldn't characterize it as a plan, and he insisted that Instagram wasn't neglected.

“In practice, we ended up investing a ton in it after we acquired it," Zuckerberg, who testified most of the afternoon, said.

In opening statements, Matheson said Meta has used its position to generate enormous profits even as consumer satisfaction has dropped. He said Meta was “erecting a moat” to protect its interests by buying the two startups.

Mark Hansen, an attorney for Meta, said the FTC was making a “grab bag” of arguments that were wrong. He said Meta has plenty of competition and has made improvements to the startups it acquired.

“This lawsuit, in summary, is misguided," Hansen said, adding: "anyway you look at it, consumers have been the big winners.”

The trial will be the first big test of President Donald Trump’s Federal Trade Commission’s ability to challenge Big Tech. The lawsuit was filed against Meta — then called Facebook — in 2020, during Trump's first term. It claims the company bought Instagram and WhatsApp to squash competition and establish an illegal monopoly in the social media market.

Meta, the FTC argues, has maintained a monopoly by pursuing Zuckerberg's strategy, "expressed in 2008: ‘It is better to buy than compete.’ True to that maxim, Facebook has systematically tracked potential rivals and acquired companies that it viewed as serious competitive threats."

Facebook also enacted policies designed to make it difficult for smaller rivals to enter the market and “neutralize perceived competitive threats,” the FTC says in its complaint, just as the world shifted its attention to mobile devices from desktop computers.

Facebook bought Instagram — then a scrappy photo-sharing app with no ads and a small cult following — in 2012. The $1 billion cash and stock purchase price was eye-popping at the time, though the deal's value fell to $750 million after Facebook's stock price dipped following its initial public offering in May 2012.

Instagram was the first company Facebook bought and kept running as a separate app. Up until then, Facebook was known for smaller “acqui-hires” — a type of popular Silicon Valley deal in which a company purchases a startup as a way to hire its talented workers, then shuts the acquired company down. Two years later, it did it again with the messaging app WhatsApp, which it purchased for $22 billion.

WhatsApp and Instagram helped Facebook move its business from desktop computers to mobile devices, and to remain popular with younger generations as rivals like Snapchat (which it also tried, but failed, to buy) and TikTok emerged. However, the FTC has a narrow definition of Meta's competitive market, excluding companies like TikTok, YouTube and Apple's messaging service from being considered rivals to Instagram and WhatsApp.

Meta, meanwhile, says the FTC’s lawsuit “defies reality.”

“The evidence at trial will show what every 17-year-old in the world knows: Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp compete with Chinese-owned TikTok, YouTube, X, iMessage and many others. More than 10 years after the FTC reviewed and cleared our acquisitions, the Commission’s action in this case sends the message that no deal is ever truly final. Regulators should be supporting American innovation, rather than seeking to break up a great American company and further advantaging China on critical issues like AI," the company said in a statement.

In a filing last week, Meta also stressed that the FTC “must prove that Meta has monopoly power in its claimed relevant market now, not at some time in the past." This, experts say, could also prove challenging since more competitors have emerged in the social media space in the years since the company bought WhatsApp and Instagram.

Meta's fate will be decided by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who late last year denied Meta's request for a summary judgment and ruled that the case must go to trial.

While the FTC may face an uphill battle in proving its case, the stakes are high for Meta, whose advertising business could be cut in half if it's forced to spin off Instagram.

Meta isn't the only technology company in the sights of federal antitrust regulators, Google and Amazon face their own cases. The remedy phase of Google's case is scheduled to begin on April 21. A federal judge declared the search giant an illegal monopoly last August.

FILE - The logo for Facebook appears on screens in New York's Times Square on March 29, 2018. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

FILE - The logo for Facebook appears on screens in New York's Times Square on March 29, 2018. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

FILE - The Meta logo is seen at the Vivatech show in Paris, June 14, 2023. (AP Photo/Thibault Camus, File)

FILE - The Meta logo is seen at the Vivatech show in Paris, June 14, 2023. (AP Photo/Thibault Camus, File)

Recommended Articles
Hot · Posts