Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Georgia’s lieutenant governor won’t be charged in 2020 election interference case

News

Georgia’s lieutenant governor won’t be charged in 2020 election interference case
News

News

Georgia’s lieutenant governor won’t be charged in 2020 election interference case

2024-09-14 04:19 Last Updated At:04:30

ATLANTA (AP) — A special prosecutor has decided not to pursue charges against Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones over efforts to overturn Donald Trump's 2020 presidential election loss in the state.

Pete Skandalakis, executive director of the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council of Georgia on Friday announced that he had decided not to bring the matter to a grand jury. Skandalakis appointed himself to handle the matter in April, nearly two years after Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis was barred from prosecuting Jones as part of her election interference case against former Trump and others.

Jones was one of 16 state Republicans who met at the Georgia Capitol in December 2020 to sign a certificate stating that Trump had won Georgia and declaring themselves the state’s “duly elected and qualified” electors even though Democrat Joe Biden had been declared the state's winner.

A state senator at the time, Jones signed a call for a special session of Georgia’s legislature aimed at overturning Biden’s narrow win in the state. He joined 26 other Georgia state lawmakers in a court brief asking the U.S. Supreme Court to agree with a request from Texas to throw out election results in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.

Jones also flew to Washington on Jan. 5, 2021, and had dinner with Vice President Mike Pence. Jones was carrying a letter from another lawmaker asking Pence to delay counting Electoral College votes. However, Jones has said he decided not to give the letter to Pence, saying he concluded Pence wasn’t open to the argument.

After Willis notified Jones in the summer of 2022 that he was a target of her investigation into possible illegal election meddling by Trump and others, he argued she shouldn't be able to prosecute him because she had hosted a fundraiser for his Democratic opponent in the lieutenant governor’s race. Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney agreed, ruling in July 2022 that Willis’ actions created an “actual and untenable” conflict of interest.

That left it up to the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council, a nonpartisan state agency that supports district attorneys, to appoint a prosecutor to decide whether Jones should be charged. After Willis obtained an indictment against Trump and 18 others in August 2023, Skandalakis, the group's head, said he would begin looking for an appropriate prosecutor to determine whether Jones should also face charges. In April, Skandalakis announced that he would take on the task himself.

“I have always wanted to tell my story in front of a fair and unbiased prosecutor, which Fani Willis clearly is not. I am thankful that I finally had the opportunity to do that," Jones said in a statement after Skandalakis' decision was announced.

A spokesperson for Willis' office declined to comment.

Skandalakis released a four-page statement explaining how he reached his decision. He wrote that he considered evidence including transcripts and depositions from a special grand jury investigation led by Willis’ office, prosecutors’ investigative file and text messages from Jones’ cellphone. He also said he interviewed Jones four times.

The investigation was confined to Jones’ actions during challenges to the 2020 general election, specifically his role in those challenges and his motives at the time, Skandalakis wrote.

He sought to answer four questions: whether the matter warranted further investigation by law enforcement, whether there should be another special grand jury investigation, whether there was enough evidence to support probable cause for criminal charges and whether the matter should be presented to a regular grand jury to consider charges. The answer to all of those questions was “no,” he wrote.

Jones “acted in a manner consistent with his position representing the concerns of his constituents and in reliance upon the advice of attorneys” when he served as a Republican elector, Skandalakis wrote. He added that Jones “did not act with criminal intent, which is an essential element of committing any crime.”

Jones has repeatedly denied wrongdoing, saying he and other Trump electors acted on the advice of lawyers to preserve the former president's chances if he won an election challenge that was pending in court at the time. Three others who signed the Republican elector certificate were among those indicted along with Trump.

Trump and the 18 others indicted in August were accused of participating in a wide-ranging scheme to illegally overturn Trump’s loss in Georgia. Four people have pleaded guilty after reaching deals with prosecutors. The others, including the former president, have pleaded not guilty.

The case is largely on hold right now while an appeal of an order allowing Willis to continue prosecuting the case is pending. Trump and others argued that a romantic relationship Willis had with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, whom she had hired for the case, created a conflict of interest. The judge in the case said there was no conflict of interest that merited Willis' removal as long as Wade left the case, which he did.

Widely expected to run for governor in 2026, Jones has positioned himself as Trump’s top surrogate in Georgia. The decision not to prosecute him is unlikely to end criticism of Jones’ actions after the 2020 elections. But it could embolden efforts in the state Senate to attack Willis.

Senators close to Jones spearheaded the creation of a special committee to investigate Willis that could then subpoena witnesses and take sworn testimony. That committee had subpoenaed Willis to appear Friday, but she did not show up.

Recommending charges against Jones could hav e put Skandalakis in a difficult spot. As lieutenant governor, Jones has influence over how much money lawmakers spend on the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council.

FILE - Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones speaks, Oct. 25, 2023, in Winder, Ga. (AP Photo/Jeff Amy, File)

FILE - Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones speaks, Oct. 25, 2023, in Winder, Ga. (AP Photo/Jeff Amy, File)

PARIS (AP) — The ex-husband of Gisèle Pelicot won't appeal his 20-year prison sentence for drugging and raping her and allowing dozens of other men to rape her while she was unconscious, in a case that revolted France, his lawyer said Monday.

Dominique Pelicot wants to spare his ex-wife a “new ordeal” of another trial, lawyer Béatrice Zavarro said in an interview with broadcaster France Info.

She said 17 of the 50 other men also found guilty this month have decided to appeal their sentences after a more than three-month trial that turned 72-year-old Gisèle Pelicot into an icon against sexual violence.

The court in the southern French city of Avignon handed down sentences ranging from three to 15 years' imprisonment for the 50 men found guilty of rape, attempted rape and sexual assault on Gisèle Pelicot over nearly a decade of shocking abuse orchestrated by her then-husband and inflicted on her unwittingly.

The court found Dominique Pelicot guilty of rape and all other charges against him and sentenced him to 20 years in prison, the maximum possible. At age 72, he could spend the rest of his life behind bars. He won’t be eligible to request early release until he’s served at least two-thirds of the sentence.

Zavarro, his lawyer, said: “He believes that the judicial page should be turned and that this chapter should be considered closed."

The appeals trial is expected to be in the last third of 2025, the appeals court in the southern city of Nimes said in a statement. It confirmed that 17 of those found guilty filed appeals ahead of a Monday night deadline.

The trial spurred a national reckoning about the blight of rape culture. Dominique Pelicot laced his wife's food and drink with tranquilizers to render her unconscious. He then invited strangers he met online to take part in sordid rape and abuse fantasies that he acted out with them and filmed in the couple’s retirement home in the small Provence town of Mazan and elsewhere.

Gisèle Pelicot’s courage during the bruising trial and her appalling ordeal, inflicted on the retired power company worker in what she had thought was a loving marriage, galvanized campaigners and triggered calls for tougher measures to stamp out rape culture.

She waived her right to anonymity as a survivor of sexual abuse and successfully pushed for the hearings and evidence — including her ex-husband’s homemade videos — to be heard in open court, insisting that shame should fall on her abusers, not her.

FILE - Lawyer Beatrice Zavarro talks to the media in the Avignon courthouse, southern France, Thursday, Dec. 19, 2024. (AP Photo/Lewis Joly, File)

FILE - Lawyer Beatrice Zavarro talks to the media in the Avignon courthouse, southern France, Thursday, Dec. 19, 2024. (AP Photo/Lewis Joly, File)

FILE - This courtroom sketch by Valentin Pasquier shows Gisèle Pelicot, left, and her ex-husband Dominique Pelicot, right, during his trial at the courthouse in Avignon, southern France, on Sept. 17, 2024. (AP Photo/Valentin Pasquier, File)

FILE - This courtroom sketch by Valentin Pasquier shows Gisèle Pelicot, left, and her ex-husband Dominique Pelicot, right, during his trial at the courthouse in Avignon, southern France, on Sept. 17, 2024. (AP Photo/Valentin Pasquier, File)

Recommended Articles