The 12-man American roster at the Presidents Cup

MONTREAL (AP) — A capsule look at the 12-man roster for the United States in the Presidents Cup, which starts Thursday at Royal Montreal:

Age: 38.

World ranking: 13.

Worldwide victories: 7.

2024 victories: BMW Championship.

Majors: PGA Championship (2011).

Presidents Cup record: 2-2-1.

Noteworthy: He is the first Ryder Cup captain to play in the Presidents Cup. His last team appearance was in the 2014 Ryder Cup. He came into view as a captain’s pick by winning the BMW Championship at Castle Pines.

Age: 28.

World ranking: 19.

Worldwide victories: 5.

2024 victories: None.

Majors: None.

Presidents Cup record: 0-3-2.

Noteworthy: A former Match Play Championship winner, Burns has a 1-5-2 record in the last Ryder Cup and Presidents Cup.

Age: 32.

World ranking: 9.

Worldwide victories: 6.

2024 victories: None.

Majors: None.

Presidents Cup record: 6-3-0.

Noteworthy: Cantlay was the center of attention at the Ryder Cup for not wearing a hat, and delivering a 45-foot winning putt with thousands of fans jeering him the entire day. Yes, he is wearing a hat at the Presidents Cup.

Age: 30.

World ranking: 6.

Worldwide victories: 3.

2024 victories: AT&T Pebble Beach.

Majors: U.S. Open (2023).

Presidents Cup record: Rookie.

Noteworthy: He set the Pebble Beach record with a 60 in the third round for his most recent victory. Clark is one of two U.S. players at Royal Montreal who made their pro team debut at the more intense Ryder Cup.

Age: 35.

World ranking: 23.

Worldwide victories: 6.

2024 victories: None.

Majors: None.

Presidents Cup record: 3-2-3.

Noteworthy: He has gone 17 months since his last victory. He has been on five of the last six U.S. teams, missing the Ryder Cup last year.

Age: 37.

World ranking: 22.

Worldwide victories: 3.

2024 victories: None.

Majors: British Open (2023).

Presidents Cup record: Rookie.

Noteworthy: He has only four top 10s since winning the British Open last year at Royal Liverpool. Harman went 2-2-0 in his Ryder Cup debut.

Age: 35.

World ranking: 14.

Worldwide victories: 4.

2024 victories: None.

Majors: None.

Presidents Cup record: Rookie.

Noteworthy: He is playing in his first U.S. team competition in his 12th year on the PGA Tour.

Age: 33.

World ranking: 25.

Worldwide victories: 7.

2024 victories: None.

Majors: None.

Presidents Cup record: 4-0-0.

Noteworthy: He has a 7-1-1 record in the Ryder Cup and Presidents Cup since making his team debut in 2022. He’s under scrutiny for these matches because he has been in a slump since early May.

Age: 27.

World ranking: 4.

Worldwide victories: 7.

2024 victories: None.

Majors: PGA Championship (2020), British Open (2021).

Presidents Cup record: 2-1-0.

Noteworthy: He has accumulated the most world ranking points in 2024 of any player without a win. He made the clinching point at the 2021 Ryder Cup.

Age: 30.

World ranking: 2.

Worldwide victories: 10.

2024 victories: PGA Championship, British Open.

Majors: PGA Championship (2024), British Open (2024).

Presidents Cup record: 6-3-0.

Noteworthy: He became the first player since Brooks Koepka in 2018 to win two majors in a year, winning the PGA Championship at Valhalla and the British Open at Royal Troon.

Age: 28.

World ranking: 1.

Worldwide victories: 15.

2024 victories: Arnold Palmer Invitational, The Players Championship, Masters, RBC Heritage, Memorial, Travelers Championship, Paris Olympics, Tour Championship.

Majors: Masters (2022, 2024).

Presidents Cup record: 0-3-1.

Noteworthy: Scheffler has a 2-5-4 record in the two Ryder Cups and one Presidents Cup he has played. He’s coming off a season of seven wins, a major, Olympic gold and the FedEx Cup title.

Age: 26.

World ranking: 11.

Worldwide victories: 1.

2024 victories: None.

Majors: None.

Presidents Cup record: Rookie.

Noteworthy: He has three runner-up finishes this year. This will be his first U.S. team competition, and he’s the youngest player on his team.

AP golf: https://apnews.com/hub/golf

Sahith Theegala hits from the second tee during the final round of the Procore Championship golf tournament at Silverado Resort North Course, Sunday, Sept. 15, 2024, in Napa, Calif. (AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez)

United States team member Xander Schauffele tees off on the third hole during a practice round at the Presidents Cup golf tournament at Royal Montreal Golf Club in Montreal, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024. (Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press via AP)

United States team member Collin Morikawa gestures on the putting green during practice at the Presidents Cup at Royal Montreal Golf Club on Monday, Sept. 23, 2024, in Montreal. (Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press via AP)

Max Homa smiles during pro-am during the Procore Championship at the Silverado Resort in Napa, Calif. on Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2024. (Scott Strazzante/San Francisco Chronicle via AP)

United States team member Russell Henley blows on his ball as he prepares to putt on the fourth hole during practice at the Presidents Cup golf tournament at the Royal Montreal Golf Club in Montreal, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024. (Christinne Muschi/The Canadian Press via AP)

United States team member Tony Finau tees off on the third hole during a practice round at the Presidents Cup golf tournament at Royal Montreal Golf Club in Montreal, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024. (Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press via AP)

United States team member Wyndham Clark tees off on the third hole during a practice round at the Presidents Cup golf tournament at Royal Montreal Golf Club in Montreal, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024. (Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press via AP)

United States team member Patrick Cantlay practices at the Presidents Cup golf tournament at the Royal Montreal Golf Club, Monday, Sept. 23, 2024 in Montreal. (Christinne Muschi/The Canadian Press via AP)

NEW YORK (AP) — Some judges in a New York appeals court appeared receptive Thursday to possibly reversing or reducing a civil fraud judgment that stands to cost Donald Trump nearly $500 million. One judge called the former president’s penalty “troubling” and wondered if the state’s policing of private business transactions was “deterrence” or “mission creep.”

A five-judge panel in the state’s intermediate appeals court in Manhattan quizzed lawyers representing Trump and the New York attorney general's office during oral arguments in the Republican presidential nominee's fight to get the Feb. 16 verdict overturned.

At times the judges appeared dubious of Trump’s side, too. Appeals court judges often ask pointed questions of both sides to test their arguments.

Trump is asking the court to reverse Judge Arthur Engoron’s ruling that Trump lied for years about his wealth on paperwork given to banks, insurers and others to make deals and secure loans. The verdict cut to the core of Trump’s wealthy, businessman persona. Three of the five judges who heard Thursday’s arguments must agree in order to alter the outcome.

Trump did not attend the hearing, which was held in an unusually ornate appellate courtroom — a far cry from the sterile courthouse where he spent weeks as a criminal defendant in his hush-money felony case earlier this year.

In the past, Trump has decried the lawsuit's outcome as “election interference” and accused Engoron of punishing him for “having built a perfect company.”

The appeals court, known as the Appellate Division, typically rules about a month after arguments, meaning a decision could come before Election Day, Nov. 5. It could uphold the trial verdict, reduce or overturn it.

Trump lawyer D. John Sauer argued that the lawsuit brought by Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, stretched the state's consumer protection laws, insinuating the government into transactions where there were “no victims" and “no complaints.”

Trump did business with “sophisticated counterparties" that performed their own due diligence rather than relying solely on Trump's financial statements — documents that Engoron ruled wildly inflated his net worth.

The case, Sauer said, “involves a clear cut violation of the statute of limitations." Judge Llinét Rosado noted that the case involved some “loans which closed long ago.”

If the verdict is allowed to stand, he argued, "people can’t do business in real estate" without fearing they'll face similar scrutiny, Sauer said.

The state's deputy solicitor general, Judith Vale, countered that “there was absolutely a public impact and a public interest here,” noting that lenders including Deutsche Bank incurred undue risk based on Trump's representations.

But Judge Peter H. Moulton questioned if James' office was engaging in “mission creep,” and whether the law she sued Trump under had "morphed into something that it was not meant to do.” At the same time, Moulton suggested the lawsuit and actions like it may deter similar actions going forward, reasoning that “in the future, some deal might not go down well and someone would be harmed by that.”

Judge David Friedman drew a distinction between Trump's case and others that were brought under the law in which corporate actions harmed large groups of people. One stemmed from the 2008 collapse of investment firm Lehman Brothers and another involved consumers taking out home loans they could not afford.

“It hardly seems that justifies bringing an action” against Trump, Friedman said. “You don't have anything like that here.”

Judge John Higgitt asked if the appeals court should consider “guardrails” to prevent James from “going into an area that wasn’t intended for her jurisdiction.”

Later, Moulton questioned Vale about Engoron's hefty punishment, observing that “the immense penalty in this case is troubling.”

Vale explained that, under the law, the judge was permitted to essentially take away whatever Trump gained from transactions based on his inflated financial statements. The gains included profits from selling properties like his Washington, D.C. hotel and savings from lower loan interest rates.

“That is an enormous benefit that they got from the misconduct, and it is not an excuse to say, ‘well, our fraud was really successful, so we should get some of the money,’” Vale argued.

The state argues there is ample evidence backing the verdict and that Trump’s appeal is based in part on arguments that Engoron and the Appellate Division have rejected before.

Sauer, a former Missouri solicitor general, previously argued Trump’s successful presidential immunity case before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Ruling after a 2½-month trial, Engoron found that Trump had padded his net worth by several billion dollars on annual financial statements by overvaluing assets including his golf courses and hotels, his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and his Trump Tower penthouse in Manhattan.

Trump and his co-defendants are also challenging Engoron’s decision to rule, even before testimony had begun, that the state had proven that Trump had fraudulently inflated his financial statements. The judge ordered Trump and the other defendants to pay $363.9 million in penalties — a sum that has now grown with interest to more than $489 million.

Trump posted a $175 million bond in April to halt collection of the judgment and prevent the state from seizing his assets while he appeals. The bond guarantees payment if the judgment is upheld. If Trump wins he’ll get the money back.

If either side doesn’t like the outcome, it can ask the state’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, to consider taking the case. Trump has vowed to fight the verdict “all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.”

Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign event, Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2024, in Mint Hill, N.C. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)