Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

Trump asks Supreme Court to allow ban on transgender members of the military to take effect, for now

News

Trump asks Supreme Court to allow ban on transgender members of the military to take effect, for now
News

News

Trump asks Supreme Court to allow ban on transgender members of the military to take effect, for now

2025-04-24 23:50 Last Updated At:04-25 00:01

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to allow enforcement of a ban on transgender people in the military, while legal challenges proceed.

Without an order from the nation's highest court, the ban could not take effect for many months, Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote, “a period far too long for the military to be forced to maintain a policy that it has determined, in its professional judgment, to be contrary to military readiness and the nation’s interests.”

The high court filing follows a brief order from a federal appeals court that kept in place a court order blocking the policy nationwide.

At the least, Sauer wrote, the court should allow the ban to take effect nationwide, except for the seven service members and one aspiring member of the military who sued.

The court gave lawyers for the service members challenging the ban a week to respond.

Just after beginning his second term in January, Trump moved aggressively to roll back the rights of transgender people. Among the Republican president's actions was an executive order that claims the sexual identity of transgender service members “conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one’s personal life” and is harmful to military readiness.

In response, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a policy that presumptively disqualifies transgender people from military service.

But in March, U.S. District Court Judge Benjamin Settle in Tacoma, Washington, ruled for several long-serving transgender military members who say that the ban is insulting and discriminatory and that their firing would cause lasting damage to their careers and reputations.

The Trump administration offered no explanation as to why transgender troops, who have been able to serve openly over the past four years with no evidence of problems, should suddenly be banned, Settle wrote. The judge is an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush and is a former captain in the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General Corps.

In 2016, during Barack Obama’s presidency, a Defense Department policy permitted transgender people to serve openly in the military. During Trump’s first term in the White House, the Republican issued a directive to ban transgender service members, with an exception for some of those who had already started transitioning under more lenient rules that were in effect during Obama's Democratic administration.

The Supreme Court allowed that ban to take effect. President Joe Biden, a Democrat, scrapped it when he took office.

The rules the Defense Department wants to enforce contain no exceptions.

Sauer said the policy during Trump's first term and the one that has been blocked are “materially indistinguishable.”

Thousands of transgender people serve in the military, but they represent less than 1% of the total number of active-duty service members.

The policy also has been blocked by a federal judge in the nation’s capital, but that ruling has been temporarily halted by a federal appeals court, which heard arguments on Tuesday. The three-judge panel, which includes two judges appointed by Trump during his first term, appeared to be in favor of the administration's position.

In a more limited ruling, a judge in New Jersey also has barred the Air Force from removing two transgender men, saying they showed their separation would cause lasting damage to their careers and reputations that no monetary settlement could repair.

Associated Press writer Lindsay Whitehurst contributed to this report.

Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.

FILE - The Supreme Court is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Dec. 17, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

FILE - The Supreme Court is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Dec. 17, 2024. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

阿聯拉斯海瑪--(BUSINESS WIRE)--五月 15, 2025--

(美國商業資訊)-- 國際信用評等機構Fitch重申對拉斯海瑪的「A+」信用評等(展望穩定),印證了該酋長國推動永續跨領域成長的策略路徑及強勁的經濟和投資環境。

本新聞稿包含多媒體資訊。完整新聞稿請見此: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250515962664/zh-HK/

拉斯海瑪政府對該公告表示歡迎,認為這是對該酋長國強勁且不斷發展的經濟、穩健的財政管理,以及其領導層對永續長期發展與成長的清晰願景和堅定承諾的肯定。

Fitch指出,酋長國代表性的旅遊專案(包括大型綜合度假村、豪華酒店和世界一流休閒設施)與房地產收入激增形成綜效,正為投資人創造商機,進一步帶動投資並強化酋長國的經濟抗風險能力。

拉斯海瑪政府發言人表示:「穩定的『A+』評等源于我們嚴謹的經濟策略、雄心勃勃的投資計畫以及對建構永續多元化經濟的長期承諾。近年來酋長國實現顯著成長,已成為極具吸引力的全球投資和旅遊中心,同時也是居住、工作和旅遊的熱門目的地。」

今年3月,拉斯海瑪成功發行10年期10億美元伊斯蘭債券,同時將公共部門債務總額控制在GDP的11%(Fitch評等主權實體中最低水準之一),2026年可望進一步降至9%。

Fitch預估,拉斯海瑪2024年GDP實際成長率從上一年的3.6%上升至6.7%。拉斯海瑪政府預期這一強勁動力將得以延續,2026年前年均成長率可望保持6.1%。這一成長主要由關鍵策略計畫驅動,特別是投資額達52億美元的Wynn Al Marjan島綜合度假村開發計畫。該度假村計畫於2027年開幕,可望推動經濟進一步擴張。

Fitch還特別強調,拉斯海瑪人均GDP水準高、治理能力強、政治穩定且法治完善,這些核心要素共同構成了該酋長國極具吸引力的投資環境。此次評等確認充分肯定了該酋長國穩健的公共財政、強勁的成長軌跡,以及做為充滿活力且安全穩定的全球商業與投資中心的地位。

*來源: AETOSWire

免責聲明:本公告之原文版本乃官方授權版本。譯文僅供方便瞭解之用,煩請參照原文,原文版本乃唯一具法律效力之版本。

請前往 businesswire.com 瀏覽源版本:https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250515962664/zh-HK/

CONTACT: 媒體查詢:Steven McCombe

media@rakmediaoffice.ae

KEYWORD: MIDDLE EAST UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

INDUSTRY KEYWORD: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC POLICY/GOVERNMENT BUSINESS PUBLIC POLICY OTHER TRAVEL TRAVEL TOURIST ATTRACTIONS

SOURCE: Ras Al Khaimah Government Media Office

Copyright Business Wire 2025.

PUB: 05/15/2025 09:20 PM/DISC: 05/15/2025 09:21 PM

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250515962664/zh

拉斯海瑪強勁的經濟和投資環境獲Fitch「A+」信用評等確認且展望穩定(照片:AETOSWire)

拉斯海瑪強勁的經濟和投資環境獲Fitch「A+」信用評等確認且展望穩定(照片:AETOSWire)

Recommended Articles
Hot · Posts