JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — A measure undoing Missouri’s near-total abortion ban will appear on the ballot in November, the state’s high court ruled Tuesday, marking the latest victory in a nationwide fight to have voters weigh in on abortion laws since federal rights to the procedure ended in 2022.
If passed, the proposal would enshrine abortion rights in the constitution and is expected to broadly supplant the state’s near-total abortion ban. Judges ruled hours before the Tuesday deadline for changes to be made to the November ballot.
Click to Gallery
The Missouri Supreme Court Justices Kelly Broniec, Robin Ransom, Brent Powell, Mary Russell, Zel Fischer, Paul Wilson and Ginger Gooch take the bench to hear a case questioning whether an amendment to overturn the state's abortion ban will remain on the November ballot, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City, Mo. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP, Pool)
Amendment 3 supporters Luz Maria Henriquez, second from left, executive director of the ACLU Missouri, celebrates with Mallory Schwarz, center, of Abortion Action Missouri, after the Missouri Supreme Court in Jefferson City, Mo., ruled that the amendment to protect abortion rights would stay on the November ballot in on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP)
Mary Catherine Martin of the conservative Thomas More Society argues before the Missouri Supreme Court that an amendment to overturn the state's abortion ban should be removed from the state's November ballot, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP, Pool)
Chuck Hatfield, an attorney for Missourians for Constitutional Freedom, argues before the Missouri Supreme Court that an amendment to overturn the state's abortion ban should remain on the state's November ballot, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP, Pool)
The Missouri Supreme Court Justices Kelly Broniec, Robin Ransom, Brent Powell, Mary Russell, Zel Fischer, Paul Wilson and Ginger Gooch take the bench to hear a case questioning whether an amendment to overturn the state's abortion ban will remain on the November ballot, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City, Mo. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP, Pool)
Abortion opponents stand outside the Missouri Supreme Court in Jefferson City, Mo., on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024, after the court heard arguments over whether an abortion-rights amendment should go before voters this year. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP)
Amendment 3 supporters Luz Maria Henriquez, second from left, executive director of the ACLU Missouri, celebrates with Mallory Schwarz, center, of Abortion Action Missouri, after the Missouri Supreme Court in Jefferson City, Mo., ruled that the amendment to protect abortion rights would stay on the November ballot in on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP)
People gather outside the Missouri Supreme Court building on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City, Mo., in advance of oral arguments on whether to remove an abortion rights constitutional amendment from the general election ballot. (AP Photo/David A. Lieb)
A vehicle passes in front of the Missouri Supreme Court building on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City, Mo., in advance of oral arguments on whether an abortion rights constitutional amendment should be removed from the general election ballot. (AP Photo/David A. Lieb)
Missouri Supreme Court to decide whether an abortion-rights amendment goes before voters
FILE - Missouri residents and pro-choice advocates react to a speaker during Missourians for Constitutionals Freedom kick-off petition drive, Feb. 6, 2024, in Kansas City, Mo. (AP Photo/Ed Zurga, File)
Missouri Supreme Court to decide whether an abortion-rights amendment goes before voters
Supreme Court judges ordered Republican Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft to put the measure back on the ballot. He had removed it Monday following a county circuit judge’s ruling Friday.
The order also directs Ashcroft, an abortion opponent, to “take all steps necessary to ensure that it is on said ballot.”
Secretary of State's Office spokesman JoDonn Chaney in an email said the Secretary of State's Office is putting the amendment on the ballot, although Ashcroft in a statement said he's “disappointed” with the ruling.
The court's full opinion on the case was not immediately released Tuesday.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom, the campaign backing the measure, lauded the decision.
“Missourians overwhelmingly support reproductive rights, including access to abortion, birth control, and miscarriage care,” campaign manager Rachel Sweet said in a statement. “Now, they will have the chance to enshrine these protections in the Missouri Constitution on November 5.”
Mary Catherine Martin, a lawyer for a group of GOP lawmakers and abortion opponents suing to remove the amendment, had told Supreme Court judges during rushed Tuesday arguments that the initiative petition “misled voters” by not listing all the laws restricting abortion that it would effectively repeal.
“This Missouri Supreme Court turned a blind eye and ruled Missourians don’t have to be fully informed about the laws their votes may overturn before signing initiative petitions,” the plaintiffs said in a statement after the decision.
Missouri banned almost all abortions immediately after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
Eight other states will consider constitutional amendments enshrining abortion rights, including Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada and South Dakota. Most would guarantee a right to abortion until fetal viability and allow it later for the health of the pregnant woman, which is what the Missouri proposal would do.
New York also has a ballot measure that proponents say would protect abortion rights, though there’s a dispute about its impact.
Voting on the polarizing issue could draw more people to the polls, potentially impacting results for the presidency in swing states, control of Congress and the outcomes for closely contested state offices. Missouri Democrats, for instance, hope to get a boost from abortion-rights supporters during the November election.
Legal fights have sprung up across the country over whether to allow voters to decide these questions — and over the exact wording used on the ballots and explanatory material. In August, Arkansas’ highest court upheld a decision to keep an abortion rights initiative off the state’s November ballot, agreeing with election officials that the group behind the measure did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired.
Voters in all seven states that have had abortion questions on their ballots since Roe was overturned have sided with abortion-rights supporters.
This story has been corrected to show that eight states outside Missouri will consider constitutional amendments enshrining abortion rights, not nine.
Associated Press reporter David A. Lieb contributed to this report.
Mary Catherine Martin of the conservative Thomas More Society argues before the Missouri Supreme Court that an amendment to overturn the state's abortion ban should be removed from the state's November ballot, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP, Pool)
Chuck Hatfield, an attorney for Missourians for Constitutional Freedom, argues before the Missouri Supreme Court that an amendment to overturn the state's abortion ban should remain on the state's November ballot, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP, Pool)
The Missouri Supreme Court Justices Kelly Broniec, Robin Ransom, Brent Powell, Mary Russell, Zel Fischer, Paul Wilson and Ginger Gooch take the bench to hear a case questioning whether an amendment to overturn the state's abortion ban will remain on the November ballot, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City, Mo. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP, Pool)
Abortion opponents stand outside the Missouri Supreme Court in Jefferson City, Mo., on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024, after the court heard arguments over whether an abortion-rights amendment should go before voters this year. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP)
Amendment 3 supporters Luz Maria Henriquez, second from left, executive director of the ACLU Missouri, celebrates with Mallory Schwarz, center, of Abortion Action Missouri, after the Missouri Supreme Court in Jefferson City, Mo., ruled that the amendment to protect abortion rights would stay on the November ballot in on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024. (Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP)
People gather outside the Missouri Supreme Court building on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City, Mo., in advance of oral arguments on whether to remove an abortion rights constitutional amendment from the general election ballot. (AP Photo/David A. Lieb)
A vehicle passes in front of the Missouri Supreme Court building on Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024, in Jefferson City, Mo., in advance of oral arguments on whether an abortion rights constitutional amendment should be removed from the general election ballot. (AP Photo/David A. Lieb)
Missouri Supreme Court to decide whether an abortion-rights amendment goes before voters
FILE - Missouri residents and pro-choice advocates react to a speaker during Missourians for Constitutionals Freedom kick-off petition drive, Feb. 6, 2024, in Kansas City, Mo. (AP Photo/Ed Zurga, File)
Missouri Supreme Court to decide whether an abortion-rights amendment goes before voters
MOUNT MAUNGANUI, New Zealand (AP) — Sri Lanka again fell short in a tough run chase as New Zealand won the second Twenty20 international by 45 runs Monday to take an unassailable 2-0 lead in the three-match series.
The tourists were edged by eight runs chasing 172-8 in the first match two days ago and again faltered late while chasing New Zealand's 186-5 on Monday. Sri Lanka was all out for 141 in 19.1 overs.
“It's really important to finish the game, no matter how it started,” Sri Lanka captain Charith Asalanka said.
“The way you finish is the most important thing. In the first game we were almost there to win and again we're disappointed.”
Once again, Jacob Duffy was New Zealand's key bowler, dismissing opener Pathum Nissanka for 37 and returning to remove Kusal Perera for 48 when both batters looked well placed to steer Sri Lanka to victory.
Nissanka made 96 in the first match in a 120-run opening partnership with Kusal Mendis before Duffy turned that match in New Zealand's favor when he took three wickets in four balls, including Mendis, to stifle the Sri Lanka chase.
He took 4-15 Monday to once again stand out as the difference between the teams.
After dismissing Nissanka, Duffy produced a superb yorker to remove Perera in the 16th over when Sri Lanka was 127-4 and still in with a good chance. He then removed Wanindu Hasaranga (1) and Maheesh Theekshana (0) in the space of three balls in the 18th over as the Sri Lanka tail again failed to fire.
Matt Henry took two wickets with consecutive balls in the 19th over before Zak Foulkes finished off the Sri Lanka innings with five balls remaining.
New Zealand depended on a century partnership between Daryl Mitchell and Michael Bracewell to post a competitive total in the first match. It produced a more balanced batting effort Monday to reach a testing total on a tricky pitch which sometimes skidded, sometimes held up and provided a batting challenge.
A strong wind across the Bay Oval also made hitting to one side of the ground difficult and gave an edge to the bowlers.
Tim Robinson made 41 from 34 balls at the top of the New Zealand innings, hitting three fours and two sixes to impart early momentum while Rachin Ravindra failed again and was out for 1.
Mark Chapman made 42 from 29 balls batting at No. 3, then wicketkeeper Mitchell made a vital contribution with an unbeaten 41 from 19 balls at the death, including four fours and two sixes. His innings also separated the teams.
“It was good to contribute to a good score, one we were pretty happy with and to contribute to a win,” Hay said.
AP cricket: https://apnews.com/hub/cricket
New Zealand's Tim Robinson and New Zealand's Rachin Ravindra head out to bat during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
New Zealand's Tim Robinson bats during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
Sri Lanka's Charith Asalanka and Binura Fernando celebrate the run out of New Zealand's Daryl Mitchell, during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
New Zealand's Tim Robinson plays a shot as Sri Lanka's Kusal Mendis looks on, during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
New Zealand's Mitch Hay bats, during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
New Zealand's Michael Bracewell and Mitch Hay walk, at the completion of their innings, during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
Sri Lanka's Kusal Perera as New Zealand's Mitch Hay looks on, during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
Sri Lanka players celebrate dismissing New ZNew Zealand's Mitch Hay and Daryl Mitchell celebrate the dismissal of Sri Lanka's Kusal Mendis, during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
New Zealand's Mitch Hay fields, during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
New Zealand's Mitch Hay and Jacob Duffy celebrate the wicket of Sri Lanka's Kusal Perera, during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
Sri Lanka's Kusal Perera bats as New Zealand's Mitch Hay looks on, during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)
New Zealand's Daryl Mitchell attempts to make a catch, during the second Twenty20 international cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka at Mt. Maunganui, New Zealand Monday, Dec. 30, 2024. (Andrew Cornaga/Photosport via AP)