Skip to Content Facebook Feature Image

US tariff hikes on Chinese goods hurt its own economy, reputation: commentary

China

China

China

US tariff hikes on Chinese goods hurt its own economy, reputation: commentary

2024-09-16 15:49 Last Updated At:23:57

The U.S. government's decision to hike tariffs on Chinese-made products, including electric vehicle batteries, critical minerals, steel and aluminum, will not only harm its economy but also tarnish its global reputation, said a China Media Group (CMG) commentary published on Sunday.

An edited English-language version of the commentary is as follows:

In May, the U.S. government announced plans to further increase tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and other products while maintaining the existing Section 301 tariffs on China. The measures were initially scheduled to take effect on Aug 1 but were postponed twice, first on July 30 and then on August 30, as the U.S. officials claimed that they needed more time to review over one thousand public opinions.

Despite a large number of public opinions opposing the imposition of additional tariffs or requesting broader tariff exemptions, the U.S. government ultimately refused to listen and went its own way. This unilateral and protectionist approach not only violates the U.S. commitment to "not seeking to suppress or contain China's development" and "not seeking to decouple from China", but also goes against the consensus reached by the two heads of state, showing that the United States is going back on its own words and breaking its own commitments made to China.

In the finalized decision released by the U.S. government, most of the items announced in May have been adopted, including a 100 percent additional tariff on electric vehicles, a 50 percent additional tariffs on semiconductors and solar cells, and a 25 percent additional tariffs on steel, aluminum, lithium-ion batteries and critical minerals.

The decision also proposed to include tungsten, wafers, and polysilicon products into the list of products subject to additional tariffs.

Analysts believe that the political implications behind the U.S. tariff hike are quite evident. With the election season approaching, both parties are intensifying their campaigns, and adopting a tough stance on China has become a form of political correctness.

During a recent TV debate, the Democratic presidential candidate criticized the Republican candidate's tariff strategy, while the current Democratic administration has ratcheted up tariffs on China just months before the end of this term.

Engaging in a tariff war will not resolve the issues, but may instead backfire on the United States. The Information Technology Industry Council, a Washington-based global tech trade association, on Friday released a statement from its President and CEO Jason Oxman, saying that the additional tariffs on China have resulted in a cumulative loss of 221 billion U.S. dollars for American companies and consumers since they were implemented.

The U.S. government has been claiming to protect domestic industries by imposing additional tariffs and even pushing for the relocation of supply chains. However, the outcomes have fallen short of expectations. The U.S. companies could hardly agree with these measures.

The U.S. tariff hike this time is primarily targeting China's new energy sector. Research indicates that the trade transfer effects of U.S. tariff measures are limited. Raising tariffs have increased import costs for the United States instead of achieving the purpose of reducing dependence on China.

The American people have also suffered a lot as a result. As the Biden administration maintained tariff hikes on certain Chinese-made products first announced during the Trump era, Americans are still paying more for shoes, suitcases and hats, according to a recent Cable News Network (CNN) report.

Estimates from Moody's, a leading rating agency, suggest that 92 percent of the costs from the raised tariffs will be borne by U.S. consumers, increasing the average American household's expenses by 1,300 U.S. dollars annually. Many economists caution that these higher tariffs will merely lead to increased costs for American consumers.

Data from the U.S. Tax Foundation indicates the tariff increase on China has not only failed to address employment issues for American workers, but also led to the loss of 142,000 jobs across the country.

For the United States, increased tariffs on China have further damaged its international image. The World Trade Organization has long ruled that the Section 301 tariffs violate WTO rules. However, instead of rectifying its wrongdoings, the United States has further increased tariffs on Chinese products, making one more mistake and once again proving that it is an outright disruptor of international rules.

The significant rise in tariffs imposed by the United States on China may jeopardize global trade and economic growth, and hinder the global green transformation pursuit.

It is known to all that Chinese companies involved in electric vehicles, lithium-ion batteries, photovoltaic batteries and other related industries have been actively promoting international cooperation in production and supply chains, contributing to the global economy and advancing green, low-carbon initiatives.

The U.S. approach of decoupling and disrupting industrial and supply chains is posing risks to both current and future prospects for humanity.

It has been proved time and again that the U.S. abuse of Section 301 to hike tariffs on China is unpopular, and its attempt to undermine Chinese companies and related industries through raising tariffs has never worked.

This round of U.S. high tariffs targeting China's new energy sector will not work either, but will only hurt its economy and image even further.

The U.S. should rectify its wrongdoings immediately and remove all additional tariffs on Chinese goods, or China will take necessary measures to firmly safeguard the interests of Chinese enterprises.

US tariff hikes on Chinese goods hurt its own economy, reputation: commentary

US tariff hikes on Chinese goods hurt its own economy, reputation: commentary

US tariff hikes on Chinese goods hurt its own economy, reputation: commentary

US tariff hikes on Chinese goods hurt its own economy, reputation: commentary

US tariff hikes on Chinese goods hurt its own economy, reputation: commentary

US tariff hikes on Chinese goods hurt its own economy, reputation: commentary

Next Article

China's Suzhou, Peru's Chancay form official sister city partnership

2024-11-16 22:23 Last Updated At:23:27

East China's Suzhou and Peru's Chancay were formally linked as sister cities during Chinese President Xi Jinping's talks with Peruvian President Dina Boluarte in Lima on Thursday.

Known for its pavilions, towers, bridges and flowing water, Suzhou has been selected as the most attractive Chinese city in the eyes of foreign experts for 12 consecutive years. It has established sister city partnerships with 59 international cities, the latest Chancay, Peru, on the other side of the Pacific Ocean.

The Port of Chancay was officially opened by the heads of state of China and Peru on Thursday evening. Earlier in September, the first cargo ship was dispatched to the China-built Port of Chancay from the Taicang Port of Suzhou.

During China's Ming Dynasty (1368-1644), navigator and diplomat Zheng He (1371-1433) set sail from Taicang to carve out China's ancient maritime Silk Road. Today, this port remains crucial for trade, domestic and international. In September and October this year, two ships carrying more than 160 sets of port-related equipment set sail from Taicang Port to the Peruvian port of Chancay.

"In the past, many routes from China to Latin America had to pass through the Panama Canal. Now that the Port of Chancay has opened, the entire voyage from the Yangtze River Delta to Peru can be shortened by about 10 days, and the shortest time to transport goods to the Port of Chancay is 23 days," said Wang Minyong, director of the Jiangsu Taicang Port Management Committee's Development and Services Bureau.

A 10-day shortening of the voyage means that the shelf life of some goods can be extended by 10 days, resulting in lower logistical costs and smaller risks.

At present, Taicang Port has two customized liner routes to eastern and western South America.

The commodities exported from Taicang to Peru mainly include vehicles and engineering equipment. From January to October this year, the number of cars exported from Taicang Port has exceeded 120,000 units, covering 28 Latin American countries and regions, an increase of more than 40 percent year on year.

"Taicang Port is the first automated terminal in terms of container management along the Yangtze River, and we are currently renovating the vehicles and cranes to make it a quasi-automated port. Chancay Port, as a newly built port in Latin America, has the advantage of being a latecomer. Its automation level is second to none among all Latin American ports," said Wang.

The ports have brought Suzhou and Chancay closer. Wei Shujie, director of the Suzhou Foreign Affairs Office, has high expectations for future cooperation between the two cities.

"The trade between Suzhou and Peru had been growing. From January to September this year, Suzhou’s trade with Peru totaled 604 million U.S. dollars, a year-on-year increase of 29.3 percent. In the future, we will strengthen communication with each other and deepen cooperation," said Wei.

It is internationally agreed that cooperation between sister cities is formal, comprehensive and long-term. A new corridor of economic and cultural exchanges is now born across the Pacific, between two countries -- and two cities.

China's Suzhou, Peru's Chancay form official sister city partnership

China's Suzhou, Peru's Chancay form official sister city partnership

Recommended Articles