Russian President Vladimir Putin supports the position of U.S. President Donald Trump on a settlement of the conflict in Ukraine, but has concerns over remaining unresolved issues, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Friday.
Despite that there are still lots to be done, the Russian president expressed solidarity with Mr. Trump's position, the spokesman said, adding that there were grounds for "cautious optimism" regarding a settlement of the conflict.
The spokesman confirmed that the Russian president held talks with U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff late on Thursday, adding that once the U.S. diplomat shared remaining details with Trump, it would be possible to determine a potential time for the two presidents to talk.
During a press briefing on Thursday, Putin said Russia is "in favor" of the 30-day ceasefire plan proposed by the U.S. and Ukraine, but that nuances exist.
Trump said later on Thursday that he saw "good signals" toward finalizing the ceasefire agreement between Russia and Ukraine.
The U.S. has reached a ceasefire agreement with Ukraine and is now negotiating a similar deal with Russia, Trump said Friday, adding that further details will be released on Monday.
On the same day, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the U.S. is "cautiously optimistic" about resolving the conflict, but he admitted that the ceasefire discussions are "a difficult and complex situation", describing it as a "long journey."
Rubio called on both Russia and Ukraine to make certain concessions to help resolve the conflict.
Responding to Putin's remarks, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said the Russian leader is setting many preconditions to delay the ceasefire for as long as possible.
He also emphasized the need for the U.S. to apply pressure on Russia to take significant steps toward ending the war.
Putin backs Trump's stance on Ukraine settlement, but says "unresolved issues" remain: Kremlin
Putin backs Trump's stance on Ukraine settlement, but says "unresolved issues" remain: Kremlin
The recent budget cut to the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which funds the Voice of America (VOA), has shed light on its role as a political tool for ideological warfare, as experts noted people's dawning recognition of such propaganda machines aimed at undermining political and social orders of other countries.
Trump's executive order, issued last Friday, designated USAGM as part of "unnecessary" federal bureaucracy. The agency, which oversees VOA, employs around 3,500 staff members and had a budget of 886 million U.S. dollars for 2024, according to its latest report to Congress.
Founded in 1942, VOA has long served as a propaganda tool for the U.S. government, advancing ideological objectives. Funding for VOA and similar institutions has continued uninterrupted for over 80 years, regardless of which political party holds power.
Experts argue that VOA is not a genuine media organization. Many of its programs are not broadcast within the United States, but instead target specific countries abroad, functioning primarily as a propaganda outlet designed to influence foreign audiences.
"While it may appear to be a so-called media organization, in reality, its actions have never constituted true journalism. Therefore, terms like openness, transparency, or credibility cannot be used to assess VOA. From its inception, it has been a political tool for the United States to implement its foreign strategies and policies, essentially functioning as a strategic instrument," said Diao Daming, deputy director of the Center for American Studies at Renmin University.
Alongside VOA, "Radio Free Asia" and "Radio Free Europe" also serve U.S. ideological needs, often targeting and attacking other countries. Many nations have recognized the damage caused by these outlets, regarding them as "unwelcome organizations".
"These so-called institutions have been recognized for causing significant disruptions to political, social, and even economic orders in other countries, often leading to events like 'color revolutions' and similar upheavals. As a result, most countries have adopted a clear stance of resistance, fully understanding the true nature of these so-called 'media' as tools of hegemonic influence," Diao added.
Coincidentally, last week, the Canberra-based Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), a think tank critical of China, announced halting its China-related research projects after the U.S. government froze its foreign funding.
Whether forced to shut down or exposed for their practices, these events highlight the vulnerability of these propaganda networks. Without funding, their operations struggle to continue. However, experts suggest that the United States is unlikely to halt its ideological campaigns and may rebrand these entities in new forms.
"I believe these institutions and individuals will likely use this opportunity to transform, employing more covert and subtle methods to carry out propaganda abroad, rather than simply halting or cutting off funding," said Yang Yujun, dean of the Academy of Media and Public Affairs at Communication University of China.
US budget cuts unveil Voice of America's role in ideological warfare: experts
